British Petroleum America, Inc Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

British Petroleum America, Inc - Case Study ExampleAccording to the research findings BP had a smashing history until the consummate(a) spill. A look into its history proves that at least in principle, the society gave tutelage to health, safety, and environmental standards. For example, in the year 2005 alone, the company invested roughly $ 8 trillion on promoting the production and trade of abject carbon power from alternative energy sources like solar, wind, and natural gas. Moreover, the company took initiatives to provide low cost liquefied petroleum gas to low income customers. In addition, the company claims that the company prepared erogenous principles in the year 2005 in order to address the increased demand for environmental vigilance. Thus, it becomes evident that the company was very careful to create an environment every(prenominal)y ethical image as it had to access environmentally sensitive areas like Alaska. It was in March 2006 that the worst oil spill in the history of the company took station in the North Slope of Alaskas tundra. It took five days to discover the oil leak, and by that time, nearly 200000 to 270000 gallons of crude oil spilled into the area. Though the exact reason of the spill is still unknown, the company has been criticized by many another(prenominal) for its improper maintenance of pipelines. In fact, the responsibility to maintain and operate the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System where the leak took go down is with the Alyeska Pipeline Service Company. But BP cannot evade from its responsibility to oversee that proper maintenance takes place. Though the primary(a) reason, according to many, is the aging and deterioration of the pipelines in the supply system, there are various factors that are believed to be the cause of early deterioration and leakage. The first such factor is the diminishing quality of the crude oil that passes through the pipeline (p. 12). It is pointed out that as more and more oil explorat ion takes place, the quality of crude oil has declined substantially. The company spokesperson opines that the reason behind corrosion can be the aim of pissing and sediment in the oil (p. 12). On the other hand, the opinion of Steve Marshall, the president of BP Exploration, is that the reason lies in the presence of an emulsion-breaking additive in the oil. The ultrasonic tests conducted in the year 2005 identified increasing corrosion in the pipeline, and as a result, the company increased the budget for pipeline maintenance, and increased the frequency of pipeline inspections. Despite all these efforts, the leak took place at a place where the pipe was buried underground. Anyway, the company and its environmental policies suck in become a center of media attention. In addition, the Office of Pipeline Safety has directed BP to conduct sodding(a) repairs and investigations and to report the same to the office. The company can use the pipeline only after it receives permission from the federal official agency. In addition, the company is likely to face a fine that can go up to $ 2.1 million (p. 10). Lastly, the efforts of the company to present itself as a green one has faced a serious decline back due to the incident. 1. From the very beginning